The idea of ​​a methodology based on an active process for a passive process has been effective in my work insofar as it has worked as a generator of works and that is why which I think if I study similar patterns and behaviors of working in artistic practices from other authors, it may be of importance to detect parallels and to be able to unravel mechanisms of the artistic process, giving value to aspects of artistic creation that we they may overlook and conceive unknowns in aspects of production that we have so far lacked in mind.

To be able to frame these in a specific context where this develops more vehemently would be important data for channeling research. Finding that there is a common logic in the artistic process from marginal phenomena or residues arising from praxis can help a pedagogy useful in understanding artistic work. I also want to highlight as an action-entity-enriching event set that they give meaning to praxis, they bring knowledge and can give a broad view of art most of the aspects that compose it. If I could find the meaning of the residual, its place in the creative process and its value, we could review certain artistic issues and reconsider some works from another point of view.

To study a work dynamics that allows me to produce knowledge from the error, randomness, the trace, that which is out of control, the disposable and those phenomena negative for the integrity of the work of art, can lead to a new formalization of the piece artistic and to give value to seemingly marginal and outdated facts and aspects.

Explain what is not we understand that within the artistic production can help to deepen in those contents that contribute a critical sense and give them a regenerating entity in the field of arts and humanities.